Ads and short-form
Cold-audience creative for Meta, LinkedIn and YouTube. Multiple hooks per concept, all three aspect ratios, built to be tested rather than admired.
- Multiple hooks per concept
- Vertical, square, landscape
- Batch produced
Explainers, demos, ads, onboarding and channel content for B2B software companies. Produced by one presenter across the whole funnel, so your audience meets the same person at every stage instead of a different stock actor each quarter.
Trusted by teams at
A B2B software purchase is not one decision. It is an ad in a feed, a page skimmed six weeks later, a demo video sent by a colleague, a YouTube result while researching alternatives, and eventually a call. Each of those touches is doing a small amount of trust-building work, and they either compound or they do not.
They compound when the same person appears across them. Recognition does an enormous amount of quiet work: by the fifth touch the viewer is not evaluating a stranger, and the first fifteen seconds of the video do not have to start from nothing. They fail to compound when each asset was produced by a different vendor with a different presenter and a different tone.
This is the argument for treating SaaS video as one continuous engagement rather than a series of unrelated projects. Simplify LLC's 76 videos across three years, all with the same presenter, is what that looks like when it runs properly.

Produced together so the language and the face stay consistent.
Cold-audience creative for Meta, LinkedIn and YouTube. Multiple hooks per concept, all three aspect ratios, built to be tested rather than admired.
The assets that carry the argument when nobody is in the room. Product explainers, sales-cycle demos, and long-form video sales letters.
Post-sale content that lowers support load and improves retention. The same presenter the customer already recognises from before they bought.
SaaS has a demonstration problem that physical products do not. You cannot photograph software in a way that conveys what it feels like to use, and a list of features communicates capability without communicating value. Video is the only format that shows the product in motion while someone explains why the motion matters.
The second problem is category confusion. Most B2B software buyers are not choosing between you and one competitor. They are trying to work out what category of thing they need at all, and half the market describes itself in language nobody outside the company uses. A person explaining the problem before the product resolves that faster than any amount of feature copy.
OptiMonk's US expansion is the clearest example on the books. Thirty-plus presenter-led videos, and four of the nine most-viewed uploads in the channel's entire history came from that engagement, with the top one at 60,264 views.

Every figure below is taken from the client's own case study page.

A US expansion built on presenter-led video, which reshaped the channel's all-time top performers.
"Working with Eric has been an absolute pleasure. He has proven to be an invaluable asset to our projects."
Barbara Bartucz, OptiMonk

Three years of continuous production with one presenter. The clearest evidence available for what consistency does over time.
"We never imagined our videos would look this professional so quickly."
Heigo Protten, Simplify LLC

Ten separate bookings over three years spanning channel content, product video and paid social.
"Eric has a very quick turnaround time and delivers professionally."
Kieran W, Workvivo by Zoom
Which stages have video, which have gaps, and which existing assets are underperforming. Usually the gap is mid-funnel.
Written as one body of work so the language matches from ad to explainer to onboarding. You approve before we film.
As many assets as are ready, in one session. This is the main lever on cost per video and the reason ongoing engagements get cheaper.
Delivered in every format you need. Then we look at what performed and film against that next time.
Most B2B SaaS teams have ads and have a homepage video, and have nothing in between. The result is traffic arriving warm and then finding nothing that explains the product properly, so it leaves to research alternatives and often does not come back.
Mid-funnel assets, the explainer, the sales-cycle demo, the VSL, are usually the highest-return place to start because they are the ones a buyer actively seeks out when they are already interested. They also get shared internally, which is how one viewer becomes a buying committee.
If you only have budget for one video this quarter, make it the one that explains the product properly to someone who already wants to understand it. That is almost never the brand film.
Mid-funnel. An explainer or a sales-cycle demo, aimed at someone who already wants to understand the product. Those get sought out and shared internally, which is how one viewer becomes a buying committee. The brand film is almost never the right first spend.
We have worked across 250+ B2B brands including martech, adtech, fintech, proptech, HR tech and developer tools. On the call I will tell you honestly if your category is one where I would need more ramp-up than usual.
Yes, and most engagements do. Teams typically have design, motion and editing covered and are missing the human on camera. We slot into that gap rather than replacing what already works.
Then modular is essential. We structure so individual sections can be recaptured without reshooting everything. Buildium ran eleven videos across nine contracts as their product evolved.
Depends on the asset. Ads by cost per result, channel video against the channel's own median, mid-funnel assets by watch time and by whether sales conversations get shorter. We agree the measure before filming, not after.
Both exist. Ongoing engagements are cheaper per video because everything batches, which is why the long relationships here tend to run for years rather than quarters.
Tell me where the gaps are. I will tell you which one to fill first.